AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.003
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0682
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0206
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0941
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1169
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0095
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0471
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0198
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0190
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0033
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0434
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0239
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0392
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0076
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0554
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0211
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0261
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0046
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0553
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0241
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0108
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0075
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0347
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0051
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0149
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0412
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0349
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0076
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0450
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0083
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0264
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0230
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0463
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0341
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0299
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0519
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0218
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0508
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0736
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0705
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0112
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0486
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0122
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0631
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0931
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0592
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0012
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0085
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0037
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0235
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0170
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0053
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0831
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0595
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0336
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0794
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0462
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0253
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0244
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0378
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0297
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0802
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0117
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0565
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0050
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0381
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0535
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0207
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0068
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0608
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0303
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0240
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0019
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0128
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0592
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0172
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0139
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0554
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0078
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0331
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0523
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0403
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0665
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0086
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0435
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0941
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0349
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0132
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0111
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0173
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0730
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0037
Answer 10-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0003
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0835
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0344
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0762
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0242
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0104
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0768


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?