آزمون بر اساس کتاب «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
حامی

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


ترس

کشور
زبان
-
Mail
دوباره محاسبه کردن
مقدار بحرانی ضریب همبستگی
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0323
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0323
توزیع غیر عادی ، توسط Spearman r = 0.0013
توزیعغیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
طبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعی
تمام س questions الات
تمام س questions الات
بزرگترین ترس من این است
بزرگترین ترس من این است
Answer 1-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0517
مثبت ضعیف
0.0335
منفی ضعیف
-0.0144
مثبت ضعیف
0.0924
مثبت ضعیف
0.0361
منفی ضعیف
-0.0178
منفی ضعیف
-0.1566
Answer 2-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0185
منفی ضعیف
-0.0003
منفی ضعیف
-0.0430
مثبت ضعیف
0.0638
مثبت ضعیف
0.0473
مثبت ضعیف
0.0137
منفی ضعیف
-0.0954
Answer 3-
منفی ضعیف
-0.0025
منفی ضعیف
-0.0108
منفی ضعیف
-0.0472
منفی ضعیف
-0.0463
مثبت ضعیف
0.0485
مثبت ضعیف
0.0797
منفی ضعیف
-0.0182
Answer 4-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0408
مثبت ضعیف
0.0285
منفی ضعیف
-0.0199
مثبت ضعیف
0.0168
مثبت ضعیف
0.0308
مثبت ضعیف
0.0243
منفی ضعیف
-0.0964
Answer 5-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0289
مثبت ضعیف
0.1325
مثبت ضعیف
0.0082
مثبت ضعیف
0.0807
منفی ضعیف
-0.0002
منفی ضعیف
-0.0242
منفی ضعیف
-0.1779
Answer 6-
منفی ضعیف
-0.0044
مثبت ضعیف
0.0099
منفی ضعیف
-0.0665
منفی ضعیف
-0.0093
مثبت ضعیف
0.0213
مثبت ضعیف
0.0859
منفی ضعیف
-0.0297
Answer 7-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0108
مثبت ضعیف
0.0398
منفی ضعیف
-0.0722
منفی ضعیف
-0.0287
مثبت ضعیف
0.0490
مثبت ضعیف
0.0677
منفی ضعیف
-0.0489
Answer 8-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0646
مثبت ضعیف
0.0833
منفی ضعیف
-0.0336
مثبت ضعیف
0.0164
مثبت ضعیف
0.0359
مثبت ضعیف
0.0146
منفی ضعیف
-0.1348
Answer 9-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0686
مثبت ضعیف
0.1671
مثبت ضعیف
0.0047
مثبت ضعیف
0.0662
منفی ضعیف
-0.0117
منفی ضعیف
-0.0516
منفی ضعیف
-0.1776
Answer 10-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0768
مثبت ضعیف
0.0732
منفی ضعیف
-0.0211
مثبت ضعیف
0.0269
مثبت ضعیف
0.0323
منفی ضعیف
-0.0107
منفی ضعیف
-0.1296
Answer 11-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0609
مثبت ضعیف
0.0573
منفی ضعیف
-0.0061
مثبت ضعیف
0.0082
مثبت ضعیف
0.0206
مثبت ضعیف
0.0240
منفی ضعیف
-0.1222
Answer 12-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0417
مثبت ضعیف
0.1008
منفی ضعیف
-0.0386
مثبت ضعیف
0.0373
مثبت ضعیف
0.0306
مثبت ضعیف
0.0247
منفی ضعیف
-0.1514
Answer 13-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0661
مثبت ضعیف
0.1024
منفی ضعیف
-0.0437
مثبت ضعیف
0.0280
مثبت ضعیف
0.0431
مثبت ضعیف
0.0157
منفی ضعیف
-0.1609
Answer 14-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0717
مثبت ضعیف
0.0988
منفی ضعیف
-0.0021
منفی ضعیف
-0.0056
مثبت ضعیف
0.0026
مثبت ضعیف
0.0094
منفی ضعیف
-0.1209
Answer 15-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0532
مثبت ضعیف
0.1345
منفی ضعیف
-0.0372
مثبت ضعیف
0.0186
منفی ضعیف
-0.0174
مثبت ضعیف
0.0212
منفی ضعیف
-0.1181
Answer 16-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0664
مثبت ضعیف
0.0282
منفی ضعیف
-0.0342
منفی ضعیف
-0.0409
مثبت ضعیف
0.0637
مثبت ضعیف
0.0252
منفی ضعیف
-0.0748


صادرات به اکسل
این قابلیت در نظرسنجی های VUCA شما در دسترس خواهد بود
خوب

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
والری
مالک محصول SaaS SDTEST®

والری در سال 1993 به عنوان یک معلم اجتماعی-روانشناس صلاحیت یافت و از آن زمان دانش خود را در مدیریت پروژه به کار گرفته است.
والری در سال 2013 مدرک کارشناسی ارشد و صلاحیت مدیر پروژه و برنامه را دریافت کرد. در طول دوره کارشناسی ارشد خود، با Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) و Spiral Dynamics آشنا شد.
والری نویسنده کتاب بررسی عدم قطعیت V.U.C.A است. مفهوم با استفاده از دینامیک مارپیچی و آمار ریاضی در روانشناسی و 38 نظرسنجی بین المللی
این پست دارد 0 نظرات
پاسخ دادن به
پاسخ را لغو کنید
نظر خود را بگذارید
×
شما یک خطا
پیشنهاد نسخه صحیح خود را
ایمیل خود را به عنوان مورد نظر را وارد کنید
ارسال
لغو کردن
Redirect to your region's domain sdtest.us ?
YES
NO
Bot
sdtest
1
سلام! بگذارید از شما بپرسم ، آیا قبلاً با دینامیک مارپیچ آشنا هستید؟