Risk management is crucial yet challenging for lenders in an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. This article presents a conceptual methodology for integrating Clare W. Graves' Spiral Dynamics framework into statistical credit scoring models. The goal is to enable a more accurate and empathetic evaluation of borrowing risk profiles. However, the approach is hypothetical and does not imply fully proven techniques ready for adoption.
The exploratory methodology aims to uncover potential linkages between financial perspectives tied to different psychological worldviews and credit behaviors. Customized questionnaires for applicants could bring out such correlates for analysis.
These psychographic factors may supplement traditional credit risk algorithms if significant explanatory connections emerge through responsible statistical modeling. However, real-world testing is needed to substantiate impacts before deployment.
The framework offers a principles-based conceptual demonstration for incorporating psychological factors into balanced AI decision-making. However, material impacts would rely on rigorous empirical validation through controlled trials.
This aspirational overview sets an agenda for future research into the feasibility of integrating social science with ethical data practices in financial infrastructure. Substantiating the hypothetical promise in this framework requires thorough evidence-gathering.
The conceptual approach provides a template for consciously co-evolving humanized digital systems. But speculation should be cautioned before lived results back up the premise. As the closing section emphasizes, "progress relies on rigorous empirical evidence" even while potential remains.
Introduction
Financial services face escalating uncertainty in the current climate. Yet existing algorithms may struggle to make contextual lending decisions. This article outlines an exploratory methodology for integrating developmental psychology models like Clare W. Graves’ Spiral Dynamics framework. The goal is to uncover potential behavioral insights across applicant segments.
The proposed approach may supplement credit scoring factors with tentative psychographic elements related to motivations and perspectives. Illustrative custom surveys could aid in uncovering such hypothesized correlates.
If responsible statistical modeling validates explanatory connections, these speculative psychographic factors might, after ethical reviews, supplement traditional algorithms. However, real-world testing would need to substantiate impacts before any deployment.
While appropriately incorporating psychological factors holds aspirational promise for balanced AI decision-making, efficacy relies on obtaining rigorous empirical evidence. Controlled trials remain imperative to progress beyond conceptual premises.
This section expands on the introductory overview without assuming proven techniques. The subsequent sections illustrate the proposed components of the framework while underscoring the imperative for extensive validation testing. As later sections emphasize – avoiding assumptions and gathering substantive proof determines impact.
Positioning with Alternative Credit Scoring
Supplementing financial data with alternative behavioral signals is an emerging trend in credit risk methodology. Common techniques include:
Alternative Data Scoring
- Incorporating non-traditional data like rent payments, utility bills, and mobile usage to uncover creditworthiness signals beyond financial statements.
Behavioral Modeling
- Statistical algorithms identifying correlations between financial behaviors like online shopping habits, cash withdrawals, risk-seeking attitudes, and default risks.
While both expand data inputs for better assessment, this Spiral Dynamics approach differs in:
- Rooted in developmental psychology frameworks to capture evolutive stages that shape financial perspectives over time based on established models like Dr. Graves' work.
- Seeks to integrate modeling with human intelligence, e.g., through loan officer guidance.
- Prioritizes ethical deployment through fairness testing and ongoing community review.
There is promising synergy leveraging psychographic, alternative, and behavioral data in a balanced, explainable, and collaborative framework - upholding both probabilistic and human wisdom.
Omni-channel information responsibly incorporated widens the risk-scoring aperture. Blending computational pattern findings with emotional intelligence and principles holds potential while mitigating biases.
Here is a framework comparison matrix distinguishing the Spiral Dynamics methodology on key dimensions against alternative credit scoring models:
The ✕ symbol indicates primary machine orientation (though they can incorporate human expertise), unlike Spiral Dynamic's overt human+machine emphasis.
Key Differentiators:
- Worldview Basis: Rooted in established developmental psychology frameworks to capture evolutive stages shaping financial perspectives.
- Human+Machine: Seeks to synergize statistical modeling with nuanced human intelligence.
- Ethical Priorities: Emphasizes responsible deployment through bias testing, explainability, and community participation.
Compared to other emerging approaches supplementing traditional credit risk data, the structured comparative analysis sharpens the unique properties of leveraging psychosocial evolution models.
Suggestions to improve credit scoring models
Here are some suggestions to improve credit scoring models using Spiral Dynamics for assessing risk in lending decisions:
- Gather data on loan applicants' Spiral stage by administering validated questionnaires like the SDTEST® and mapping responses to corresponding color levels. Include vital demographic variables.
- Build statistical models correlating credit risk indicators (defaults, late payments) with Spiral stages. For example, does the safety-seeking Blue mindset have higher repayment consistency?
- Incorporate significant psychographic correlations into credit scoring algorithms in addition to traditional factors like income, employment history, etc. For instance, "Having a highly Blue risk aversion profile reduces the probability of delinquent borrowing."
- Real-world pilot testing pathways test the viability of developed models through carefully designed trials before they are adopted.
- Weight Spiral stage variables proportionately based on predictive capability in multiple regression scoring models. For example, "If score from Blue correlation > 15%, increase base score by 10 points" (illustrative).
- Retest the new scoring system against credit performance datasets. Equally important is testing for adverse impacts or biases against any group before adoption.
- Implement dynamic scoring models with periodically refreshed insights from updated psychological and loan data. Build a feedback loop for improving model accuracy.
- Loan officers should be provided with customized psychographic information to augment application assessments, especially in complex cases. These insights help structure packages to suit applicant mindsets, such as stricter repayment schedules for Blue.
- Expand scope by developing separate psychographic models for lending products (credit cards, mortgages, business banking). People may show divergent financial behavior across contexts aligned with Spiral stage expression.
In summary, meticulously incorporating Spiral correlations can lead to more prudent, ethical, and tailored lending risk models if rigorously validated. The enhanced psychosocial perspective allows lenders to move from purely economic to human-centered capital evaluation.
1. Gather Data on Loan Applicants' Spiral Stage
An essential prerequisite for building credit risk models that incorporate Spiral Dynamics is gathering data on applicants' psychological development levels based on Dr. Graves' framework.
One validated psychometric questionnaire is the SDTEST®, which assigns color categories to people based on their worldviews, motivations, and values. Out of 80559 results from 169 countries, results clustered into the 7791 unique motivational patterns. SDTEST® has 28 different VUCA polls that calculate the 9,191 correlation values between stages of development according to the theory of Spiral Dynamics and answer options of these 28 polls. People evolve through different colors as coping systems to handle increasing complexity.
Lenders can customize the standard SDTEST® by selecting about 25 core questions most relevant to financial attitudes and administering them to loan applicants online. For example:
- I set strict budgets for discretionary expenses
- I explore creative future possibilities in my financial planning
- Tradition guides my monetary principles
After collecting responses, have them mapped by certified analysts to corresponding colors like Purple, Orange, Green, etc, on the Spiral spectrum. Most applicants get distributed among 2-3 prominent colors with varying saturation.
Additionally, it captures key demographic attributes like age, income range, education level, and risk tolerance.
This primary Spiral assessment data, credit bureau information, and financial KYC provide the foundation for the next phase - statistical modeling to quantify relationships between developmental levels and repayment behaviors.
Appropriate data privacy practices should govern the use of psychographic information. Transparency over protocols can enable equitable, ethical integration into credit risk algorithms.
2. Build Statistical Models
Once applicant psychographic data has been collected through customized questionnaires mapped to Spiral colors, credit risk analysts can build models quantifying correlations between developmental stages and financial behaviors.
The target variables to predict would be existing credit performance metrics indicating repayment abilities or challenges for each applicant:
- Number of days past due
- Default history
- Bankruptcy flags
- Credit utilization
- Payment to income ratios
Based on questionnaire responses, a multivariate correlation analysis can identify relationships between these credit indicators and dominant Spiral stages associated with each applicant.
For example, preliminary insights may reveal that individuals aligned strongly with the order-seeking Blue meme have lower adverse indicators like lower late fee instances. This may indicate more discipline in repayment schedules.
In contrast, the unrestrained Red impulsivity stage may demonstrate higher credit utilization or income ratios. The innovative yet volatile Orange may take more risks, increasing bankruptcies.
Cluster analysis can also combine people with similar Spiral stage concentrations into segments for analysis. Comparisons can uncover further group-level patterns.
These explanatory models would need rigorous testing on broader datasets before extracting signals for credit algorithms. Initially, identifying correlations allows quantifying risks and opportunities associated with developmental mindsets.
3. Incorporate Significant Correlations
Lenders' most common credit scoring models rely on demographic, financial, and bureau data features. These include age, income, debts owned, payment histories, industry volatility risk, etc.
Psychographic elements related to mindsets and motivations uncovered through analysis can serve as additional explanatory features for algorithmic learning.
The most significant relationships can be integrated based on correlation strength and predictive power. For example, the model may discover:
"Applicants with a high Blue profile concentration (score >0.7) indicating rules-based financial traditionalism have a 15% lower likelihood of 90+ day delinquency across lending products".
This can translate to:
IF Applicant_Spiral_Blue_Score > 0.70
THEN Base_Risk_Score = Base_Risk_Score - 15
Here, the solid Blue correlation deducts penalty points from the base risk score to reduce the likelihood of default. The exact algorithm would require multivariate regression analysis to model more comprehensive datasets accurately.
Similar equations can encode positive risk correlations, such as higher bankruptcy tendencies for unrestrained Red profiles. The coefficients quantitatively link psychographic patterns to financial behaviors.
Incorporating Spiral factors to supplement existing scoring factors can enable better contextualization of credit behaviors. However, teams must prevent unfair biases, ensure explainable models, and analyze enough behavioral data samples for robust correlations.
4. Real-world pilot testing pathways
Their feasibility requires validation through controlled experimental trials before fully integrating revised psychographic credit scoring models.
A randomized controlled pilot can assess the impact of incorporating psychological factors on lending risk calibration. Hypothetical steps:
- Select a randomized subsample of past loan applicants spanning the credit spectrum
- Retroactively develop Spiral scoring models for this pilot subsample based on theoretical constructs
- Compare outputs between existing vs Spiral Dynamics integrated algorithms
- Gauge whether enhanced models improve predictive accuracy on historical defaults
- Importantly, evaluate if score improvements arise equivalently across demographic groups
The controlled experiment allows testing core viability in a contained environment across vintage applicants.
Key assessments include:
- Overall risk prediction capacity uptake
- Fairness metrics across customer segments
- Operational implementation viability
- Client experience acceptability
Before advancing frameworks, gathering evidence from controlled studies guards against unfounded optimism. If feasibility is substantiated, wider deployment can be planned with greater confidence.
Iterative pilots help crystallize operational and architectural adjustments needed to optimize integrity and performance before scale investment. Responsible experimentation couples conceptual promise with tangible diligence.
5. Weight Variables by Predictive Capability
In multiple regression models, the coefficient values signify the predictive strength of that variable. Higher absolute values imply a more significant influence on the target variable.
For instance, after regression analysis, the Spiral scoring model may yield coefficients (illustrative):
Blue: -0.15
Red: +0.03
Green: +0.10
Here, Blue has the highest coefficient, suggesting it best explains variances in repayment consistency. Green also contributes significantly.
These coefficients can be directly applied as weights in risk-scoring equations:
If Applicant_Spiral_Blue_Score > 0.75
Then:
Risk_Score = Base_Score - (0.15) * Applicant_Spiral_Blue_Score
If Applicant_Spiral_Green_Score > 0.60
Then:
Risk_Score = Risk_Score + (0.10) * Applicant_Spiral_Green_Score
The negative Blue coefficient reduces overall risk progression by deducting higher points for Blue applicants.
The positive Green coefficient analogously increments scores for highly Green applicants proportionately.
The relative weighting ensures alignment with predictive capability - factors with more explanatory power have a higher influence.
Of course, the actual algorithm requires extensive testing across demographic segments to avoid unfair biases. But this illustrative example shows one approach to align with the statistical strengths of correlations.
6. Retest Models Before Adoption
Comprehensive testing is imperative before deployment once the credit risk algorithms integrate the most predictive Spiral correlations.
The updated models with psychographic factors should be backtested on at least 6-12 months of historical applicant data.
The simulated risk scores are compared with the actual subsequent credit performance of those consumers to quantify accuracy improvements.
Testing across varied demographic segments on parameters like:
- Vintage analysis: Model efficacy across generations
- Geography: Consistent reliability across regions?
- Gender: Fairness for men, women, and non-binary identities
Equally importantly, bias testing frameworks must rigorously assess if any group faces adverse impacts from the new algorithms. Techniques include:
- Comparing score distributions across segments
- Auditing conditions leading to rejection rate deviations
- Testing sub-groups conform equally to score patterns
All contradictions that surface during testing are addressed before activating the models. No performance efficiency gains justify unfairness risks.
The layered testing funnel - encompassing backtesting, bias mitigation, external audit, and consumer surveys establishes holistic trust in updated systems before initiating change.
7. Continual Model Refreshment
While initially incorporating Spiral correlations can enhance default probability calibration, financial behaviors evolve along with societal developmental shifts.
Hence, the psychographic questionnaires assessing applicant mindsets and values should be refreshed every 24-36 months.
As the economy goes through cycles of volatility, individual motivations also adapt in response. Capturing these contemporary perspectives requires a periodical re-deployment of surveys.
Refreshed questionnaire data matrices can be inputted into templates for automated reconstruction of correlation models and scoring algorithms.
In parallel, as new loan data accrues, performance time series are appended to back-testing datasets for re-validation across demographic facets.
Ideally, the rebuild iteration also runs new trials around bias testing, explains ability, external audit, and worst testing to uphold equity standards, as constraints may also flux with time.
Beyond scheduled rebuilds, early warning trigger indicators should be instituted for closer monitoring.
For example, a spike in population defaults beyond Six Sigma variance across 3 out of 5 regions can trigger an alert for intervention analysis in case systemic shifts are underway. Proactive pattern diagnosis facilitates the development of pre-emptive strategies.
Together, continually revitalizing questionnaires, forward-looking performance data feeds, and real-time vigilance systems can sustain model relevance amidst turbulence. The living benchmarks also aid in understanding VUCA's root causes.
8. Enable Human-Machine Intelligence
While algorithmic systems have advantages in speed and automation, human intelligence still exceeds AIs in nuanced aspects like empathy, exception handling, and trust building.
Hence, the Spiral Dynamics scoring model outputs can serve as supplemental guides for loan officers when evaluating applications, rather than as absolute decrees.
The psychographic profiles, based on customised surveys, highlight applicant worldviews, values, and motivations regarding financial planning horizons, debt perspectives, and stability orientation.
In complex cases like borderline application decisions or tailored repayment structure needs, these Spiral insights assist officers in making tailored decisions aligned with the borrower's mindset.
For example, the models may indicate an applicant's high traditionalist Blue profile. This signifies strong habits and fiscal discipline but also inflexibility. Hence the officer can structure a favorable loan package with fixed repayment schedules through automatic debits suited to the personality.
On the other hand, an entrepreneurial Red profile suggests a desire for urgency and risk-taking. Therefore, an adjustable "progressive" interest rate plan allows dynamic alignment to their volatile cash flows while preventing overleverage through built-in checks on amounts.
Such human-empowered assessment of psychographic profiling enables consultative, win-win structuring of lending products, unlocking credit access experiences that ratings alone may miss. The combination balances both rigor and empathy.
9. Customized Models by Lending Vertical
While an overarching psychographic scoring framework can serve as the foundation, nuanced financial behaviors manifest differently across lending contexts.
Hence it is proposed to develop specialized Spiral scoring algorithms vertically across the following:
- Credit Cards
- Auto Loans
- Personal Loans
- Mortgages
- Small Business Lending
Tailored questionnaires for each product cohort can map mindsets and motivations specific to that domain while retaining base template consistency.
Context-tuned stats modeling correlates attitudes and repayment behaviors more precisely to shape unique algorithms.
For instance, an entrepreneur may take aggressive risks in business financing while being conservative on fixed home loans. Or a traditionalist prioritizes paying off mortgages before credit card balances.
Specialized scoring layered atop product suites thus accounts for the multi-dimensional complexity in borrowing decisions people make by situation. Unlocking this granularity improves predictive validity while avoiding assumptions.
Over time, adding emerging lending instruments like "Buy Now Pay Later" (BNPL) allows for continually updating models to address new volatility dimensions with contextual rigor.
Risks and Mitigations
Deploying psychographic techniques in credit risk models poses ethical challenges if mishandled:
Public Perception Risks
- Questionable biases degrading certain groups may spark public distrust, backlash, and reputation damage
Mitigation: Rigorously vet models for fairness gaps pre and post-launch through bias testing toolkits. Create consumer redressal channels.
Explainability Risks
- Inability to interpret scoring factors can undermine trust and regulator acceptance
Mitigation: Maintain the highest documentation standards. Enable intuitive visibility into influential variables.
Data Reliability Risks
- Survey fatigue impacting applicant psychometric input quality
- Confirmation bias in human mapping of responses to Spiral stages
Mitigation: Evaluate iterative questionnaires to refine relevance and simplicity. Audit mappings for consistency.
Proactively identifying critical ethical, explainable, and accurate AI challenges allows preemptive mitigation planning through governance frameworks and pilot testing. Prioritizing trust and transparency is foundational. Ongoing community review boards assessing model impacts can address emergent issues.
Here is a risk mitigation hierarchy ordered by priority level and mapping appropriate strategies:
The prioritization considers public perception risks highly likely and impactful if questionable biases emerge. Data quality issues are a moderate priority, given the reliance on applicant surveys. Explainability gaps have lower immediate damage risk.
This relative rating allows proportional resource allocation - with maximum oversight and mitigation investments into bias vetting and ethical transparency safeguards.
The tiered hierarchy sets the foundation for optimized, risk-calibrated project planning and phase-wise mitigation response as the methodology progresses from conceptual to real-world trials.
Regulatory implications
Here is an overview of key regulatory considerations for responsibly operationalizing psychographic techniques in lending:
1. Reporting Protocols
- Submit algorithmic scoring methodology documents detailing data sources, analytical processes, variable weights, and business logic to regulators.
- Disclose psychographic factors used, their correlations, and their proportional impact on credit decisions to ensure transparency.
- Provide bias testing audits, adverse impact analysis reports, and explainability benchmarks as part of compliance packages.
2. Compliance Audits
- Flag higher-risk applicants impacted by psychographic scoring for selective credit file audits.
- Conduct regular default and rejection rates analysis across customer demographics to catch emerging disparities.
- External algorithmic audits before launch and periodically after activation.
3. Community Participation
- Create customer grievance redressal channels accessible to applicants.
- Constitute advisory review boards with independent financial, technical, and community experts to evaluate model fairness.
Proactive regulatory collaboration, external algorithmic audits, community participation, and transparent disclosures establish guardrails for ethically integrating psychographic approaches in lending. Responsible innovation requires higher-order accountability.
Examples of applying specific correlations
Here are examples of applying these specific correlation findings from the survey on financial attitudes to the credit risk modeling context.
Masalah terbesar yang dihadapi negara saya
Semua soalan
Masalah terbesar yang dihadapi negara saya adalah
Masalah terbesar yang dihadapi negara saya adalah
Answer 1
17%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 2
8%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 3
7%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 4
6%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 5
10%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 6
9%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 7
14%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 8
4%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 9
7%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 9
9%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Answer 10
10%
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Tunjukkan 1445 Keputusan pada carta
Pilih hasil (e-mel) untuk eksport
Pilih hasil (e-mel) untuk eksport
Eksport ke MS Excel
Fungsi ini akan tersedia dalam pemilihan VUCA anda sendiri
Here is an interpretation of the specific correlation findings between societal problems and Spiral Dynamics stages:
- positive correlation of 0,032 between the Inflation and the Purpule stage,
- negative correlation of -0,0459 between the Inflation and the Turquoise stage,
- positive correlation of 0,0651 between the Country's budget deficit and the Yellow stage,
- positive correlation of 0,1155 between Illegal immigration and the Red stage,
1) Positive Inflation-Purple correlation:
This implies individuals aligned with traditional values and conventional wisdom may perceive higher volatility from price rise turbulence. More fixed-rate lending products help mitigate such inflation-oriented uncertainty for this group.
2) Negative Inflation-Turquoise correlation:
The lower inflation concern for this integral, adaptive stage indicates comfort with pricing dynamism. Variable rate schemes accepting wider rate bands suit this flexibility.
3) Positive Budget Deficit-Yellow correlation:
Higher deficit worries for this systemic stage signal fiscal prudence and financial acumen. Their planning orientation rewards customized capital structuring advisory while transparency builds trust.
4) Positive Immigration-Red correlation:
This individualistic, competitive demographic connects societal changes from immigration to economic impacts. Messaging highlighting upside opportunities while addressing pressures helps secure buy-in for financial initiatives responding to people movement volatility.
In summary, correlating geo-economic policy anxieties with Spiral mindsets provides cues to craft tailored financial products, communication narratives, and crisis response strategies catering to the outlook of disparate worldviews prevalent among customer or citizen groups.
Here is an interpretation of the specific correlation findings between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages:
- positive correlation of 0,0782 between the Fear of World War and the Orange stage,
- negative correlation of -0,0603 between the Fear of Arbitrary rule of the authorities and the Blue stage,
- positive correlation of 0,0888 between the Fear of Return to repression and the Yellow stage,
- positive correlation of 0,0499 between the Fear of Losing a job and the Purpul stage.
1) Positive War-Orange correlation:
The higher geopolitical volatility concern indicates this achievement-driven group favors models accounting for macro uncertainty impacting their aggressive growth plans. Scenario testing helps customize capital support.
2) Negative Authoritarianism-Blue correlation:
Lower anxiety about heightened governance in this rules-based stage signals acceptance of oversight, strengthening financial integrity. Alignment eases compliance integration for prudent controls.
3) Positive Repression-Yellow correlation:
Despite adaptability, anxiety persists over the resurgence of restrictions that can limit potential. Fostering their autonomy through flexible repayment options sustains loyalty amidst policy changes.
4) Positive Job Loss-Purple correlation:
The existential threat of income discontinuity worries this traditionalist demographic. Providing access to bridge financing, reskilling support, and open communication channels aids their security.
In summary, quantifying differentiation in VUCA-related financial fears and ambivalence across applicant psychographic spectrums allows consultative structuring of lending products aligned with the outlook of each archetype.
Consolidated correlation analysis
Here is a consolidated correlation analysis of the Fears and Biggest Problems facing my country polls, with examples applying the findings:
- Positive Inflation-Purple: Fixating to guard against pricing instability. Simpler fixed-rate products bring familiarity.
- Negative Inflation-Turquoise: Agile in adapting to flux; variable pricing OK. Scenario modeling aids decisions amidst volatility.
- Positive Budget Deficit-Yellow: Anxious about fiscal laxity risks despite adaptability. Merit nuanced policy analysis.
- Positive Immigration-Red: Relate societal change to economic impacts. Messaging balances opportunities and pressures.
- Positive War-Orange: Geopolitical risks concerning despite opportunism. Scenario testing to customize capital support.
- Negative Authoritarianism-Blue: Oversight boosts integrity and confidence. Eases compliance integration for prudent controls.
- Positive Repression-Yellow: Anxious over the resurgence of restrictions limiting potential. Sustains loyalty via flexible options.
- Positive Job Loss-Purple: Income discontinuity evokes existential threat. Bridge financing and support channels offer security.
In summary, psychographic differentiation across applicant mindsets allows tailored product structuring aligned with each archetype's outlook and ambient anxiety level.
Quantifying volatility perception variances supplements default probability calibration with nuanced psychosocial context. This empowers consultative lending packaged to the borrower's prudent and empathetic perspective.
Potential Business Impact
If correlations between psychographic factors and credit behaviors manifest in real-world testing, incorporating a Spiral Dynamics approach could drive significant business upside:
Default Rate Reduction
- A 25-50 basis point drop in defaults can generate over $180 million in saved losses annually for a top 10 US bank based on their net charge-off rates
Expanded Applicant Pool
- Psychographic contextualization allows prudently approving another 10-15% of applicants previously near score cut-offs, enabling higher revenue
Revenue Upside
- Increased lending volumes across newly qualified applicants can boost interest income by an estimated $250-400 million per year
The examples assume a major US bank with 50 million customers and $80 billion in outstanding loans. The actual upside depends on the strength of the substantiated correlations.
However, indicative modeling illustrates that even moderately improving risk scoring accuracy and coverage through psychological dimensionality unlocks substantial financial and social impact from reduced defaults and expanded credit access.
Ethical imperatives
The responsible validation, explainable design, and community co-creation of models are imperatives for sustained innovation. The prime goal is balancing predictive accuracy with consumer welfare through transparent AI.
In summary, strengthening empirical foundations, quantifying potential harms, validating predictive contribution, gradual rollout, and reiterating ethical priorities in improved frameworks help realize the promise of enhancing credit access without compromising prudence or transparency in the VUCA world. The possibilities spark progress, but the imperatives guide change.
Conclusion
This article presented an exploratory methodology for integrating Clare W. Graves' Spiral Dynamics framework of developmental psychology within financial risk algorithms. Tailored psychometric questionnaires help uncover worldview nuances across lending applicants. Correlating these motivational indicators with credit behaviors and geo-economic policy anxieties reveals segmentation insights.
The approach outlines an architectural blueprint and an aspirational paradigm for the ethical usage of psychographic data analytics. Beyond prudent default probability calibration, the enriched psychosocial perspective allows structured tailoring of supportive solutions aligned with diverse borrower mindsets. This balances statistical rigor with human empathy.
The framework underscores the importance of continually refreshing quantitative models and cultural assumptions to address escalating VUCA turbulence. Expanding economic inclusion requires institutionalizing guardrails like testing protocols, adverse impact audits, explainability standards, and community review boards for trust and transparency.
Integrating social science into financial infrastructure marks a turning point for systems thinking. Blending computational power with emotional intelligence paves the path for next-generation markets, enhancing access without jeopardizing stability or agency. Consecrating these balanced values ex-ante into scoring architectures sustains relevance amidst exponential technological disruptions.
Adapting lending paradigms to resonate across worldviews spurs a movement towards democratizing capital responsibly. The lasting opportunity is for financial neural networks built with society’s full spectrum to mirror the markets they serve.
2024.02.06
Valerii Kosenko
Pemilik Produk SaaS Pet Project SDTest®
Valerii layak sebagai ahli pedagogi sosial-psikologi pada tahun 1993 dan sejak itu telah menggunakan pengetahuannya dalam pengurusan projek.
Valerii memperoleh ijazah sarjana dan kelayakan pengurus projek dan program pada tahun 2013. Semasa program tuannya, beliau menjadi akrab dengan Roadmap Project (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) dan Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii mengambil pelbagai ujian dinamik lingkaran dan menggunakan pengetahuan dan pengalamannya untuk menyesuaikan versi semasa SDTest.
Valerii adalah pengarang meneroka ketidakpastian V.U.C.A. Konsep menggunakan dinamik lingkaran dan statistik matematik dalam psikologi, lebih daripada 20 pemilihan antarabangsa.
