Seeking Deeper Understanding #052

SDTEST^® has 38 different VUCA polls that calculate the 13,643 correlation values between stages of development according to the theory of Spiral Dynamics and answer options of these 38 polls.

We invite curiosity about the systemic mechanisms behind this correlation. There may be hidden variables that provide alternative explanations.

In our analysis of the poll "Biggest problems facing my country," we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.0657 between the Inflation and the Purple stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0477. This positive correlation of 0.0657 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.0657 between Inflation and the Purple stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Purple value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Purple mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. A supernatural sign that economic imbalances threaten sacred traditions and communal stability.
2. Confirmation that ancestral economic practices are being disrupted by modern monetary forces.
3. Evidence that spiritual harmony in resource distribution has been disturbed.

These organizations might respond by:

• Conducting traditional ceremonies to restore economic balance.
• Consulting tribal elders and spiritual leaders for guidance on managing resources.
• Reinforcing ancient customs of communal sharing and mutual support.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Purple mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing inflation as a violation of sacred economic traditions.
2. Interpreting rising prices as a sign of spiritual disharmony within the community.
3. Seeing economic challenges as a test of tribal bonds and collective resilience.

These teams might respond by:

• Creating ritualistic practices for sharing resources during difficult times.
• Strengthening clan-based support systems to protect against economic hardship.
• Developing ceremonial exchanges to maintain traditional economic relationships.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Purple value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation that modern economic forces threaten ancestral ways.
2. Evidence that spiritual intervention is needed to restore economic balance.
3. Confirmation that traditional economic wisdom must be preserved.

These individuals might respond by:

• Seeking guidance from spiritual leaders about personal financial decisions.
• Participating in communal rituals aimed at economic protection.
• Maintaining traditional bartering and sharing practices within their clan.

This correlation, viewed through the Purple lens, suggests that those operating at the Purple level deeply connect inflation to spiritual and traditional concerns. It implies that the Purple value system's focus on ancestral wisdom, communal bonds, and supernatural forces shapes their understanding of economic challenges.

The reasons why Inflation might be seen as a major problem in the Purple stage could include:

1. Sacred Balance: Inflation disrupts traditional economic relationships seen as divinely ordained.
2. Ancestral Wisdom: Rising prices challenge time-honored practices of resource management.
3. Community Bonds: Economic pressure threatens established patterns of tribal sharing.
4. Spiritual Harmony: Financial instability is viewed as a sign of supernatural disapproval.
5. Traditional Identity: Modern economic forces challenge ancient ways of life.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems understand economic challenges. It raises questions about the role of tradition and spirituality in shaping responses to modern financial pressures.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex interplay between cultural values, economic realities, and communal survival. In Purple-dominant environments, inflation is seen not merely as an economic issue but as a spiritual and cultural challenge requiring traditional solutions and divine intervention.

In our analysis of the poll "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (Y / N)," we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.0676 between the Reduced salary and the Red stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0538. This positive correlation of 0.0676 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.0676 between Reduced salary and the Red stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Red value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Red mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their power to control resources and dominate employee compensation.
2. Confirmation that aggressive cost-cutting demonstrates organizational strength.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in survival of the fittest business practices.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing sudden salary reductions to assert dominance.
• Compensation is used as a tool to maintain power hierarchies.
• Creating competitive environments where employees fight for limited resources.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Red mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing salary reduction as a demonstration of team leaders' power.
2. Interpreting pay cuts as challenges to be overcome through aggression and dominance.
3. Seeing reduced compensation as motivation for internal competition.

These teams might respond by:

• Encouraging fierce competition for remaining resources.
• Developing informal power structures to protect their interests.
• Creating alliances to secure better compensation packages.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Red value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal opportunity to demonstrate dominance through survival.
2. Evidence that only the strongest will maintain their compensation levels.
3. Confirmation that power and aggression determine financial success.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively competing against colleagues for resources.
• Using intimidation to protect their salary levels.
• Seeking opportunities to demonstrate their indispensability through force.

This correlation, viewed through the Red lens, suggests that those operating at the Red level view salary reduction as a power play in organizational dynamics. It implies that the Red value system's focus on dominance, competition, and immediate gratification shapes its approach to compensation challenges.

The reasons why salary reduction might be seen as acceptable in the Red stage could include:

1. Power Display: Salary cuts demonstrate organizational dominance.
2. Survival Mentality: Only the strongest deserve full compensation.
3. Competitive Drive: Reduced resources fuel aggressive competition.
4. Immediate Control: Quick financial decisions show decisive leadership.
5. Force Assertion: Salary reduction proves organizational might.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence compensation strategies. It raises questions about the relationship between power dynamics and financial decision-making in organizations.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the Red value system's approach to resource allocation and power demonstration. In Red-dominant environments, salary reduction becomes a tool for asserting dominance and testing employee resilience rather than a purely financial decision.

In our analysis of the poll "How Do You Regulate Your Emotions?" (by Nawal Mustafa [1]), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.1213 between the When I feel ANGRY. I will pause until I am able to think clearly so l can respond rationally instead of reacting / Strongly Disagree and the Blue stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1212. This positive correlation of 0.1213 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.1213 between disagreeing with rational anger management and the Blue stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Blue value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Blue mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation that emotional reactions should align with established codes of conduct.
2. Confirmation that immediate responses demonstrate loyalty to organizational values.
3. Evidence that righteous anger serves a moral purpose in upholding standards.

These organizations might respond by:

• Creating strict protocols for expressing appropriate emotional responses.
• Implementing formal systems that justify immediate reactions to violations.
• Promoting leadership that demonstrates swift moral judgment.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Blue mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing immediate emotional responses as signs of commitment to team values.
2. Interpreting quick reactions as necessary for maintaining order and discipline.
3. Seeing swift anger as a tool for enforcing compliance with rules.

These teams might respond by:

• Developing clear guidelines for appropriate emotional expressions.
• Encouraging immediate responses to violations of team protocols.
• Establishing systems that reward swift defense of team values.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Blue value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation that immediate moral responses are virtuous.
2. Evidence that controlling anger contradicts righteous indignation.
3. Confirmation that swift reactions uphold moral standards.

These individuals might respond by:

• Expressing immediate disapproval of rule violations.
• Viewing their quick emotional responses as duty-bound reactions.
• Using anger as a tool for maintaining moral order.

This correlation, viewed through the Blue lens, suggests that those operating at the Blue level may view immediate emotional reactions as morally appropriate. It implies that the Blue value system's emphasis on order, duty, and moral righteousness aligns with swift reactions to perceived violations.

The reasons why pausing before responding to anger might be rejected in the Blue stage could include:

1. Moral Duty: Swift responses demonstrate commitment to moral standards.
2. Righteous Indignation: Immediate reactions show strong ethical convictions.
3. Rule Enforcement: Quick responses help maintain order and discipline.
4. Traditional Values: Historical precedent supports immediate moral judgments.
5. Hierarchical Authority: Swift reactions reinforce power structures.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence emotional regulation. It raises questions about the relationship between moral conviction and emotional response in structured environments.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the complex interplay between duty, morality, and emotional expression in Blue-dominant environments. Here, immediate reactions to anger are seen not as impulsiveness, but as necessary demonstrations of moral conviction and organizational loyalty.

In our analysis of the poll "21 skills that pay you forever" (by Jeremiah Teo / 赵汉昇 [2]), we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.1813 between the Ability to sell and negotiate / Strongly Agree and the Orange stage.

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.1317. This positive correlation of 0.1813 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.1813 between the Ability to sell and negotiate and the Orange stage offers intriguing insights when viewed through the lens of the Orange value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Orange mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation that negotiation skills directly impact bottom-line results and market success.
2. Confirmation that sales ability is a measurable, scientific predictor of organizational growth.
3. Evidence supporting their belief in merit-based advancement through demonstrable skills.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing data-driven sales training programs based on proven methodologies.
• Creating analytical frameworks to measure and reward negotiation effectiveness.
• Developing systematic approaches to optimize sales processes and outcomes.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from an Orange mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing sales and negotiation as strategic tools for achieving quantifiable objectives.
2. Interpreting these skills as competitive advantages that can be systematically improved.
3. Seeing negotiation prowess as a measurable indicator of team performance.

These teams might respond by:

• Adopting scientific methods to analyze and enhance sales techniques.
• Creating metrics-based systems for tracking negotiation success rates.
• Implementing technological solutions to optimize sales processes.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Orange value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation that mastering sales and negotiation leads to measurable success.
2. Evidence supporting investment in developing these skills for career advancement.
3. Confirmation that rational, strategic approaches to selling yield superior results.

These individuals might respond by:

• Pursuing evidence-based training in sales and negotiation techniques.
• Analyzing personal performance data to optimize their approach.
• Leveraging technology and research to enhance their capabilities.

This correlation, viewed through the Orange lens, suggests that those operating at the Orange level highly value sales and negotiation as scientifically verifiable paths to success. It implies that the Orange value system's focus on achievement, rationality, and measurable results aligns perfectly with these strategic skills.

The reasons why sales and negotiation skills are highly valued in the Orange stage could include:

1. Measurable Impact: These skills produce quantifiable results and ROI.
2. Strategic Advantage: They provide a competitive edge in the marketplace.
3. Performance Metrics: Success in these areas can be objectively measured.
4. Scientific Approach: These skills can be systematically developed and improved.
5. Goal Achievement: They directly contribute to reaching strategic objectives.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence skill valuation. It raises questions about the relationship between rational capability development and market success.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the Orange value system's emphasis on practical, results-oriented skills that drive measurable success. In Orange-dominant environments, sales and negotiation abilities are viewed as strategic assets that can be scientifically developed and optimized for maximum return on investment.

In our analysis of the poll "What qualities and abilities do good leaders use when building successful teams?" we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.1004 between the Empathetic and the Green stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0395. This positive correlation of 0.1004 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.1004 between Empathetic leadership qualities and the Green stage offers meaningful insights when viewed through the lens of the Green value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Green mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their commitment to creating inclusive, emotionally intelligent workplaces that prioritize human connection.
2. Confirmation that empathetic leadership aligns with their values of sustainability and collective wellbeing.
3. Evidence supporting their belief that organizational success stems from understanding and addressing stakeholder needs holistically.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing comprehensive emotional intelligence training programs for all leadership levels.
• Creating feedback systems that measure and reward empathetic leadership behaviors.
• Developing policies that prioritize work-life balance and employee wellbeing.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Green mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their collaborative, supportive team culture.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing emotional safety and psychological well-being.
3. Seeing it as support for their focus on building deep, meaningful connections within the team.

These teams might respond by:

• Incorporating regular emotional check-ins and team building activities.
• Creating safe spaces for vulnerable conversations and authentic expression.
• Fostering mentorship relationships that emphasize emotional support and growth.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Green value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their empathetic approach to leadership and collaboration.
2. Evidence supporting their belief in the power of emotional intelligence in team settings.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on authentic relationships and mutual understanding.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively developing their emotional intelligence and empathy skills.
• Seeking opportunities to mentor others in empathetic leadership practices.
• Modeling vulnerable and authentic communication in team interactions.

This correlation, viewed through the Green lens, suggests that those operating at the Green level demonstrate high empathy within teams. It implies that the Green value system's focus on community, emotional intelligence, and holistic understanding aligns with a more nurturing and inclusive approach to team dynamics.

The reasons why Empathetic qualities are essential for team success in the Green stage include:

1. Holistic Understanding: Empathy enables leaders to understand and address the complex interconnections between team members' needs and organizational goals.
2. Sustainable Relationships: Empathetic leadership builds lasting, authentic relationships that support long-term team success.
3. Inclusive Decision-Making: Empathy helps leaders consider diverse perspectives and create inclusive solutions.
4. Emotional Safety: Empathetic environments foster psychological safety, enabling innovation and authentic contribution.
5. Systemic Awareness: Empathy supports leaders in understanding and addressing systemic impacts of decisions on all stakeholders.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of effective leadership. It raises questions about the essential role of empathy in building sustainable teams, particularly in contexts where long-term collaboration and complex problem-solving require deep understanding and emotional intelligence.

This correlation highlights how empathetic leadership aligns with Green value system's focus on human connection, sustainability, and collective wellbeing. It suggests that organizations operating at this level recognize empathy as a crucial leadership quality for building successful, sustainable teams.

In our analysis of the poll "Are you ready to receive less pay to work remotely?" we found an intriguing positive correlation that warrants closer examination:  

0.0829 between the Yes, I am ready to receive less pay to work remotely and the Yellow stage.

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0614. This positive correlation of 0.0829 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This positive correlation of 0.0829 between willingness to accept lower pay for remote work and the Yellow stage offers meaningful insights when viewed through the lens of the Yellow value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Yellow mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Validation of their systems-thinking approach to work arrangements and compensation.
2. Confirmation that flexible work models align with higher-order organizational evolution.
3. Evidence supporting their integration of multiple stakeholder needs and perspectives.

These organizations might respond by:

• Implementing adaptive compensation models that consider holistic value creation.
• Designing work systems that optimize both individual autonomy and organizational effectiveness.
• Creating flexible frameworks that accommodate diverse work preferences and life circumstances.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Yellow mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their adaptive and integrative approach to collaboration.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing individual growth alongside team objectives.
3. Seeing it as support for creating flexible, purpose-driven team structures.

These teams might respond by:

• Developing hybrid collaboration models that maximize both autonomy and connection.
• Implementing results-based performance metrics independent of work location.
• Creating systems that support both synchronous and asynchronous collaboration.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Yellow value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their holistic approach to work-life integration.
2. Evidence supporting their prioritization of personal growth and development.
3. Confirmation of their ability to see value beyond traditional monetary compensation.

These individuals might respond by:

• Actively seeking work arrangements that optimize personal effectiveness.
• Viewing remote work as an opportunity for self-directed growth and development.
• Making conscious trade-offs between financial and non-financial forms of value.

This correlation, viewed through the Yellow lens, suggests that those operating at the Yellow level demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of value exchange. It implies that the Yellow value system's integrative thinking and focus on personal development align with a more nuanced approach to work arrangements and compensation.

The reasons why individuals might accept lower pay for remote work in the Yellow stage include:

1. Holistic Value: Understanding compensation beyond purely financial terms.
2. Systems Thinking: Recognizing the broader impacts of work arrangements on life quality.
3. Personal Growth: Prioritizing opportunities for development and self-direction.
4. Life Integration: Valuing the ability to create optimal work-life synergies.
5. Adaptive Mindset: Embracing flexible arrangements that support individual effectiveness.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of work value and compensation. It raises questions about the evolution of work arrangements in complex adaptive systems, particularly in contexts where personal growth and systemic optimization are prioritized over traditional metrics of success.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the sophisticated interplay between individual choice, organizational systems, and value creation in Yellow-dominant environments. Remote work compensation might be seen not as a simple trade-off but as part of a complex system of value exchange and personal development.

In our analysis of the poll "What makes a boss a great leader?" we found an intriguing negative correlation that warrants closer examination:  

-0.0576 between the Trustworthiness and the Turquoise stage. 

The critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0414. This negative correlation of -0.0576 meets the reliability criteria but does not necessarily imply causation.

This negative correlation of -0.0576 between Trustworthiness as a leadership quality and the Turquoise stage offers meaningful insights when viewed through the lens of the Turquoise value system:

Organizational Perspective:

Organizations operating within the Turquoise mindset might interpret this correlation as:

1. Recognition that leadership transcends traditional notions of trustworthiness toward collective consciousness.
2. Validation that effective leadership emerges from systemic awareness rather than individual reliability.
3. Evidence that organizational success stems from interconnected relationships rather than hierarchical trust.

These organizations might respond by:

• Developing leadership frameworks based on collective wisdom and emergence.
• Implementing systems that support distributed decision-making and shared responsibility.
• Creating cultures that value authentic connection over traditional authority structures.

Team Perspective:

Teams operating from a Turquoise mindset might approach this correlation by:

1. Viewing it as affirmation of their focus on collective intelligence over individual reliability.
2. Interpreting it as validation for prioritizing systemic harmony over personal trust.
3. Seeing it as support for evolving beyond traditional leadership-follower dynamics.

These teams might respond by:

• Fostering environments where leadership emerges naturally from collective wisdom.
• Creating spaces for authentic connection beyond traditional trust relationships.
• Developing practices that honor the interconnectedness of all team members.

Individual Perspective:

Individuals aligned with the Turquoise value system might interpret this correlation as:

1. Personal validation of their evolution beyond conventional leadership paradigms.
2. Evidence supporting their focus on collective consciousness over individual reliability.
3. Confirmation of the value they place on systemic awareness over personal trust.

These individuals might respond by:

• Cultivating their capacity for systemic awareness and collective consciousness.
• Moving beyond traditional trust-based relationships toward authentic connection.
• Embracing their role in the larger organizational ecosystem.

This correlation, viewed through the Turquoise lens, suggests that those operating at the Turquoise level transcend conventional notions of trustworthiness in leadership. It implies that the Turquoise value system's focus on interconnectedness and collective consciousness supersedes traditional leadership qualities.

The reasons why Trustworthiness might not be seen as a primary leadership quality in the Turquoise stage include:

1. Systemic Awareness: Leadership emerges from understanding interconnections rather than individual reliability.
2. Collective Consciousness: Decision-making stems from group wisdom rather than trust in individuals.
3. Authentic Connection: Relationships based on genuine interconnectedness supersede traditional trust.
4. Evolutionary Purpose: Leadership serves the system's evolution rather than maintaining trust-based hierarchies.
5. Holistic Integration: Success comes from systemic harmony rather than individual trustworthiness.

This correlation prompts us to consider how different value systems influence perceptions of effective leadership. It raises questions about the evolution of leadership beyond traditional trust-based paradigms, particularly in contexts where collective consciousness and systemic awareness are paramount.

Ultimately, this correlation highlights the transcendent nature of leadership in Turquoise-dominant environments. Trustworthiness might be seen not as a primary leadership quality but as a basic assumption superseded by higher-order capabilities for systemic awareness and collective consciousness.

We welcome respectful and wise perspectives! Stay tuned every week as we share more results and insights. 

After login or registration, free access to the poll results in the FAQ section.

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/nawal-mustafa-84a90591
[2] https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremiah-teo-charisma-business-coach

Valerii Kosenko

Proprietar de produs SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii a fost calificat ca pedagog social-psiholog în 1993 și de atunci și-a aplicat cunoștințele în managementul proiectelor.
Valerii a obținut o diplomă de master și calificarea de manager de proiect și program în 2013. În timpul programului său de master, s-a familiarizat cu Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) și Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii este autorul explorării incertitudinii V.U.C.A. concept folosind Spiral Dynamics și statistici matematice în psihologie și 38 de sondaje internaționale.