Home/Blog/Could MBTI be coupled with Spiral Dynamics?

Could MBTI be coupled with Spiral Dynamics?

We received this question after the publication of articles Simple SDTEST^® Gives Great Possibilities and Mathematical Psychology. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Spiral Dynamics are two systems that categorize personality traits and motivational values, respectively. This article is dedicated to answering this question. It will show with a real example how to use the SDTEST^® V.U.C.A. poll designer.

Brief Overviews of the Systems

MBTI categorizes personality into 16 types based on preferences across four dichotomies: Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving. It has been extensively validated and applied in career development, leadership, and team-building.

Spiral Dynamics maps the evolution of motivational value systems in a spectrum of colors or levels, from basic survivalist Beige to holistic-minded Turquoise. It builds on Clare Graves' theory of levels of human existence and has been used extensively in organizational development and coaching. SDTEST^®has 83879 results from 170 countries, results clustered into 7931 unique motivational patterns.

While both systems group people into "types", MBTI reflects non-hierarchical preferences while Spiral Dynamics depicts hierarchical development.

Possible Connections Between the Systems

Some relationships could potentially be theorized between MBTI types and Spiral levels based on apparent similarities in focus:

Intuitive types (N) may gravitate toward the holistic Yellow and Turquoise levels.
Sensing types (S) match the practical Red and Blue levels.
Thinking types (T) resonate with the objective, logical Orange level.
Feeling types (F) align with the harmonic Green level.

So Intuitive, Feeling types like INFJ could speculatively be associated with later Green and Yellow Spiral levels, while Sensing, Thinking types such as ISTJ fit earlier Blue and Orange levels.

Studying the correlation between Spiral Dynamics developmental stages and MBTI personality types could potentially yield some useful insights, but it also has limitations:

Potential benefits:

Seeing relationships between motivational values and personality preferences - e.g., Achiever Orange correlated with Thinking preference
Understanding interactions between developmental level and type - e.g., how INFJs may express differently at different Spiral levels
Explaining tensions within types via value differences - e.g., INTJs driven by power versus achievement
Mapping types/functions to transitional stages - e.g., Intuition in late Orange, Feeling in early Green

Limitations:

Differences in goals and validation of the two systems
Individuals express both multiple values and multifaceted personalities
Correlations may reinforce stereotypes about both frameworks

Intriguing connections may emerge, directly linking MBTI types to Spiral Dynamics levels.

The SDTEST^® V.U.C.A. poll designer

The SDTEST^® V.U.C.A. poll designer is as simple as Google Forms. Watch this two-minute video to get acquainted and compare. The main difference of the SDTEST® V.U.C.A. poll designer is the presence of an independent multilingual UI for changing the site language and poll form. If, for example, your primary site language is English, and you do the poll in 6 international UN languages, then you only need to use the language change window for the poll form. If you are doing this work together with colleagues whose primary language is Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, German, French, or other languages, then for their convenience, they can change the language of the site.

Create and share your Poll (MBTI)

Now you know the functionality of the Designer, and you can create your own, for example, MBTI.

We invite you to look “under the hood” of the poll Psychological Wellbeing (by Carol D. Ryff) we have already created. Developed by psychologist Carol D. Ryff, the 42-item Psychological Wellbeing (PWB) Scale. Source: Ryff, Carol D., Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in Science and Practice, NIH Public Access, Psychother Psychosom, Vol.83, No.1, Pp.31, (2014). Watch the next two-minute video.

Now you need to share the link to your survey, and survey participants choose the language in which they are comfortable answering the questions. Watch the next one-minute video.

Poll results and their analysis

We do not have the results of the MBTI poll, so for example, we will use the poll “Psychological Wellbeing (by Carol D. Ryff)“ we used above.

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Psychological Wellbeing (by Carol D. Ryff)“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Psychological Wellbeing (by Carol D. Ryff)

Charts Correlation

VUCA

All questions

1) Autonomy (how much do you agree or disagree?)

2) Environmental mastery (how much do you agree or disagree?)

3) Personal growth (how much do you agree or disagree?)

4) Positive relations with others (how much do you agree or disagree?)

5) Purpose in life (how much do you agree or disagree?)

6) Self-acceptance (how much do you agree or disagree?)

1) Autonomy (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 1

33%

✔

Answer 2

34%

✔

Answer 3

15%

✔

Answer 4

✔

Answer 5

✔

Answer 6

✔

Answer 7

✔

Answer 8

24%

✔

Answer 9

34%

✔

Answer 10

17%

✔

Answer 11

✔

Answer 12

10%

✔

Answer 13

✔

Answer 14

✔

Answer 15

✔

Answer 16

21%

✔

Answer 17

23%

✔

Answer 18

13%

✔

Answer 19

✔

Answer 20

14%

✔

Answer 21

13%

✔

Answer 22

30%

✔

Answer 23

35%

✔

Answer 24

17%

✔

Answer 25

✔

Answer 26

✔

Answer 27

✔

Answer 28

✔

Answer 29

✔

Answer 30

18%

✔

Answer 31

16%

✔

Answer 32

10%

✔

Answer 33

11%

✔

Answer 34

17%

✔

Answer 35

22%

✔

Answer 36

11%

✔

Answer 37

19%

✔

Answer 38

21%

✔

Answer 39

11%

✔

Answer 40

✔

Answer 41

14%

✔

Answer 42

14%

✔

Answer 43

43%

✔

Answer 44

27%

✔

Answer 45

13%

✔

Answer 46

✔

Answer 47

✔

Answer 48

✔

Answer 49

✔

2) Environmental mastery (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 50

29%

✔

Answer 51

35%

✔

Answer 52

15%

✔

Answer 53

✔

Answer 54

✔

Answer 55

✔

Answer 56

✔

Answer 57

✔

Answer 58

18%

✔

Answer 59

18%

✔

Answer 60

✔

Answer 61

12%

✔

Answer 62

17%

✔

Answer 63

17%

✔

Answer 64

✔

Answer 65

15%

✔

Answer 66

22%

✔

Answer 67

13%

✔

Answer 68

11%

✔

Answer 69

16%

✔

Answer 70

16%

✔

Answer 71

20%

✔

Answer 72

33%

✔

Answer 73

19%

✔

Answer 74

✔

Answer 75

✔

Answer 76

✔

Answer 77

✔

Answer 78

✔

Answer 79

14%

✔

Answer 80

14%

✔

Answer 81

12%

✔

Answer 82

10%

✔

Answer 83

19%

✔

Answer 84

23%

✔

Answer 85

32%

✔

Answer 86

33%

✔

Answer 87

14%

✔

Answer 88

✔

Answer 89

✔

Answer 90

✔

Answer 91

✔

Answer 92

10%

✔

Answer 93

15%

✔

Answer 94

20%

✔

Answer 95

11%

✔

Answer 96

10%

✔

Answer 97

16%

✔

Answer 98

18%

✔

3) Personal growth (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 99

74%

✔

Answer 100

16%

✔

Answer 101

✔

Answer 102

✔

Answer 103

✔

Answer 104

✔

Answer 105

✔

Answer 106

✔

Answer 107

✔

Answer 108

✔

Answer 109

✔

Answer 110

✔

Answer 111

13%

✔

Answer 112

64%

✔

Answer 113

✔

Answer 114

✔

Answer 115

✔

Answer 116

✔

Answer 117

✔

Answer 118

14%

✔

Answer 119

63%

✔

Answer 120

62%

✔

Answer 121

24%

✔

Answer 122

✔

Answer 123

✔

Answer 124

✔

Answer 125

✔

Answer 126

✔

Answer 127

✔

Answer 128

10%

✔

Answer 129

14%

✔

Answer 130

10%

✔

Answer 131

10%

✔

Answer 132

22%

✔

Answer 133

27%

✔

Answer 134

✔

Answer 135

✔

Answer 136

✔

Answer 137

✔

Answer 138

✔

Answer 139

16%

✔

Answer 140

55%

✔

Answer 141

58%

✔

Answer 142

24%

✔

Answer 143

✔

Answer 144

✔

Answer 145

✔

Answer 146

✔

Answer 147

✔

4) Positive relations with others (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 148

37%

✔

Answer 149

35%

✔

Answer 150

14%

✔

Answer 151

✔

Answer 152

✔

Answer 153

✔

Answer 154

✔

Answer 155

28%

✔

Answer 156

33%

✔

Answer 157

17%

✔

Answer 158

10%

✔

Answer 159

✔

Answer 160

✔

Answer 161

✔

Answer 162

11%

✔

Answer 163

13%

✔

Answer 164

12%

✔

Answer 165

✔

Answer 166

11%

✔

Answer 167

18%

✔

Answer 168

27%

✔

Answer 169

✔

Answer 170

10%

✔

Answer 171

10%

✔

Answer 172

10%

✔

Answer 173

✔

Answer 174

19%

✔

Answer 175

34%

✔

Answer 176

46%

✔

Answer 177

29%

✔

Answer 178

10%

✔

Answer 179

✔

Answer 180

✔

Answer 181

✔

Answer 182

✔

Answer 183

13%

✔

Answer 184

13%

✔

Answer 185

13%

✔

Answer 186

✔

Answer 187

✔

Answer 188

16%

✔

Answer 189

30%

✔

Answer 190

55%

✔

Answer 191

24%

✔

Answer 192

✔

Answer 193

✔

Answer 194

✔

Answer 195

✔

Answer 196

✔

5) Purpose in life (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 197

50%

✔

Answer 198

26%

✔

Answer 199

12%

✔

Answer 200

✔

Answer 201

✔

Answer 202

✔

Answer 203

✔

Answer 204

✔

Answer 205

10%

✔

Answer 206

11%

✔

Answer 207

✔

Answer 208

13%

✔

Answer 209

20%

✔

Answer 210

31%

✔

Answer 211

40%

✔

Answer 212

27%

✔

Answer 213

13%

✔

Answer 214

✔

Answer 215

✔

Answer 216

✔

Answer 217

✔

Answer 218

38%

✔

Answer 219

22%

✔

Answer 220

12%

✔

Answer 221

12%

✔

Answer 222

✔

Answer 223

✔

Answer 224

✔

Answer 225

✔

Answer 226

12%

✔

Answer 227

12%

✔

Answer 228

✔

Answer 229

✔

Answer 230

19%

✔

Answer 231

31%

✔

Answer 232

✔

Answer 233

✔

Answer 234

✔

Answer 235

10%

✔

Answer 236

✔

Answer 237

16%

✔

Answer 238

48%

✔

Answer 239

✔

Answer 240

15%

✔

Answer 241

16%

✔

Answer 242

12%

✔

Answer 243

11%

✔

Answer 244

16%

✔

Answer 245

24%

✔

6) Self-acceptance (how much do you agree or disagree?)

Answer 246

✔

Answer 247

15%

✔

Answer 248

16%

✔

Answer 249

✔

Answer 250

✔

Answer 251

17%

✔

Answer 252

25%

✔

Answer 253

28%

✔

Answer 254

31%

✔

Answer 255

15%

✔

Answer 256

✔

Answer 257

✔

Answer 258

✔

Answer 259

✔

Answer 260

11%

✔

Answer 261

17%

✔

Answer 262

14%

✔

Answer 263

12%

✔

Answer 264

✔

Answer 265

16%

✔

Answer 266

22%

✔

Answer 267

33%

✔

Answer 268

32%

✔

Answer 269

16%

✔

Answer 270

✔

Answer 271

✔

Answer 272

✔

Answer 273

✔

Answer 274

24%

✔

Answer 275

25%

✔

Answer 276

15%

✔

Answer 277

19%

✔

Answer 278

✔

Answer 279

✔

Answer 280

✔

Answer 281

10%

✔

Answer 282

14%

✔

Answer 283

13%

✔

Answer 284

20%

✔

Answer 285

10%

✔

Answer 286

15%

✔

Answer 287

19%

✔

Answer 288

42%

✔

Answer 289

31%

✔

Answer 290

14%

✔

Answer 291

✔

Answer 292

✔

Answer 293

✔

Answer 294

✔

This functionality will be available in your own VUCA polls

Exploring correlations between the two systems, MBTI and Spiral Dynamics, could provide additional insights into motivational development and personality.

Some opportunities this could open up include:

Gaining a more multifaceted view of personality by seeing how motivational values at different Spiral levels interact with MBTI preferences. For example, Thinking types may express differently at Blue conformity-focused stages versus Orange achievement-focused stages.
Understanding nuanced developmental pathways for different personalities. For instance, mapping what transitional stages INTJs may pass through as they evolve in consciousness compared to ESFPs.
Diagnosing developmental conflicts and tensions within the same MBTI type driven by differing value systems. An ESTJ at the Red power-driven stage may experience internal tensions with one at the Orange efficiency-focused stage.
Appreciating how different MBTI functions or skill sets come to the fore at different Spiral levels. For example, Intuition was expressed more strongly in late Orange, and Feeling came online in early Green.
Tailoring coaching and development interventions by incorporating personality and motivational level insights. An INFP may need a different approach at Blue versus Green.

However, deriving such integrative insights requires avoiding simplistic stereotyping, acknowledging limitations in current Spiral Dynamics validation, and recognizing that personality and values are multi-faceted within individuals. If these complexities are accounted for, exploring potential connections between the frameworks could yield a more textured perspective on the interplay between personality type, values, and consciousness development over the lifespan. However, this endeavor requires extensive additional research and cautious interpretation.

Conclusion

In summary, while the MBTI personality typology and Spiral Dynamics developmental spectrum offer distinct lenses, exploring their potential connections could yield additional insights. Observing how motivational values interact with personality preferences at different stages may provide a more multifaceted view of individual differences. However, directly coupling the two frameworks oversimplifies their nuances.

Each system has a different purpose and validation base. Individuals express multifaceted personalities and multi-layered values that resist rigid mapping between categories. Stereotyping risks must also be avoided. If these complexities are recognized, judiciously analyzing relationships between the two systems could contribute to a more textured understanding of personality and consciousness development. However, further research and careful interpretation are required to derive meaningful integrative insights from correlations.

An open and nuanced exploration of how motivational development interplays with personality types, without forcing definitive linkages, may offer complementary perspectives that enrich our comprehension of the psychology of individual differences. This endeavor promises intellectual rewards but requires diligence in acknowledging both frameworks' limitations and avoiding oversimplification. With care, synergies between them may help capture a fuller portrait of diversity in personality and values.

2023.10.22

Valerii Kosenko

Product owner SaaS pet project SDTEST®

Valerii was qualified as a social pedagogue-psychologist in 1993 and has since applied his knowledge in project management.
Valerii obtained a Master's degree and the project and program manager qualification in 2013. During his Master's program, he became familiar with Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) and Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii took various Spiral Dynamics tests and used his knowledge and experience to adapt the current version of SDTEST.
Valerii is the author of exploring the uncertainty of the V.U.C.A. concept using Spiral Dynamics and mathematical statistics in psychology, more than 20 international polls.

This Post has 0 Comments

Reply to

Cancel a reply

Leave your comment

In a business	Own farm	Family business	Starting up a personal business	Business Process Management	Project management	Social networks	Win-Win-Win behavior	Synthesis
Management style	Manual control			Regular			Innovative
In a life	Survival	Family relations	The rule of force	The power of truth	Competition	Interpersonal relations	Flexible stream	The Global vision
Color	beige	purple	red	blue	orange	green	yellow	turquoise
Average by poll, %	0	5	4	14	21	17	23	17
Country All Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burma Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Ethiopia Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Georgia Germany Ghana Great Britain Greece Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle Of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kingdom of Bhutan Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritius Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of El Salvador Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Singapore Sint Maarten Slovakia Slovenia South African Republic South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St. Lucia Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Republic of Korea Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Ok Cancel	0	5	6	14	22	17	22	14
Language All Afrikaans Arabic Armenian Azerbaijani Basque Belarusian Bosnian Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Indonesian Italian Japanese Kazakh Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Slovak Spanish Swedish Telugu Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Xhosa Yoruba Ok Cancel	0	5	5	13	20	17	23	17